Canadians Being Assessed For Euthanasia Outside Fast Food Restaurants As Mass Culling Boom Saves Government Money

According to a report by the National Post and The Globe And Mail, a Canadian doctor allegedly completed a patient assessment outside the fast food restaurant Tim Hortons, then drove the patient to a holding facility in an industrial unit where he was euthanized, according to reports.

“A London, Ont., doctor who assessed a patient with inflammatory bowel disease and a history of mental health issues for MAID outside a Tim Hortons location and later personally drove the man to the place his life was ended has agreed to a minimum six months’ supervision,” the National Post said Sunday.

Euthanasia was the fifth leading cause of death in Canada in 2024, but its popularity is growing.

Akin to abortion for adults, a successful MAID procedure results in the death of the patient, but some patients face complications such as continuing to live.

“In another case, Dr. James MacLean failed to administer one of three drugs used in assisted deaths — one that paralyzes the body’s muscles, including the muscles involved in breathing. The patient resumed spontaneously breathing again after initially being pronounced dead, and after MacLean had already left the home,” the National Post said.

In that case, the doctor was allegedly able to return to the euthanasia location and allegedly kill the patient again, according to The Globe And Mail:

In the case of the patient who spontaneously resumed breathing, the college’s records show that Dr. MacLean ordered a MAID medication kit from a pharmacy, but it wasn’t ready when he went to collect it, so he used a previously acquired kit. 

The college’s decision shows Dr. MacLean administered an anesthetic but did not give the 67-year-old cancer patient the neuromuscular-blocking medication customarily used in an assisted death because he was unable to locate it in his briefcase. 

Shortly after administering the anesthetic, Dr. MacLean pronounced the patient’s death. He told the college that because the patient was frail and because he did not detect respirations or a heartbeat, he thought the neuromuscular-blocking medication was not necessary. After Dr. MacLean left the patient’s home, the patient resumed spontaneous breathing, the decision states. Dr. MacLean then returned, administered additional medication, including the neuromuscular-blocking agent, and again pronounced the patient dead. 

Due to allegedly botching the killings, the provincial government investigated the doctor, according to the National Post.

“As part of an investigation by the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario (CPSO) into two public complaints made against MacLean, an independent assessor appointed to review a number of MacLean’s charts concluded that he ‘did not meet the standard of practice of the profession, displayed a lack of judgment and that his conduct exposes or is likely to expose patients to harm or injury in five out of twenty charts reviewed,’ according to a summary decision of the college’s inquiries, complaints and reports committee,” the National Post said.

The article said that as a result of the alleged infractions the doctor will be more heavily scrutinized in his euthanasia operations.

“In addition to agreeing to mandatory clinical supervision for at least six months as part of an ‘undertaking’ with the college, MacLean will undergo ongoing review of his MAID patient charts and mandatory professional education related to MAID, consent, documentation, professional boundaries and professional behaviour,” the National Post said.

The Globe and Mail reported on the Tim Hortons euthanasia assessment allegedly conducted by the doctor:

The other complaint centres on the death of Mr. Dillon, who had been deemed eligible for MAID by Dr. MacLean and a nurse practitioner because of his suffering and decline related to the Crohn’s diagnosis and persistent complications with an external pouch to collect waste. 

Extensive medical records, which were obtained by the family and shared with The Globe, show Mr. Dillon had a history of alcohol abuse, depression and suicidal ideation. These records included files from Mr. Dillon’s family doctor, a psychiatrist, a gastroenterologist and an internal medicine doctor.

According to the medical records and the college’s 16-page decision, which the family provided to The Globe, Dr. MacLean conducted Mr. Dillon’s MAID eligibility assessment outside of a Tim Hortons coffee shop on June 27, 2023, in St. Thomas, Ont. Dr. MacLean and Mr. Dillon proceeded to exchange dozens of text messages about plans for the medically assisted death, the records show. 

On the morning of Jan. 29, 2024, Dr. MacLean met Mr. Dillon at the Tim Hortons and then drove him to a location in London where Mr. Dillon had agreed to have the procedure done, the college’s decision states. Dr. MacLean administered the lethal medications in a room at a holding facility in an industrial unit where cadavers are prepared for transport to funeral homes.

The college faulted Dr. MacLean for crossing professional boundaries and taking an unduly casual approach with the assessment location but did not object to the venue where the death took place.

Humans are moving from an asset to a liability for governments. This is especially true with the advancement of AI systems. The mass slaughter of citizens can save governments huge sums of money.

“Medical assistance in dying could reduce annual health care spending across Canada by between $34.7 million and $138.8 million, exceeding the $1.5–$14.8 million in direct costs associated with its implementation,” a study said in 2017.

Undergoing euthanasia is currently voluntary in Canada, but non-voluntary euthanasia has been found to be even more financially advantageous for the government.

“Both voluntary and non-voluntary scenarios were analyzed, projecting total savings of up to CAD $1.273 trillion by 2047,” a comprehensive cost-benefit analysis research article from 2025 said.

That research article “Government Economics of Expanding Canada’s Medical Assistance in Dying to Vulnerable Populations and the Ethical Implications of Allowing the State to Control Death” by Uzair Jamil and Joshua M. Pearce explored the savings the Canadian government will receive from killing off various classes of undesirable humans in both voluntary and non-voluntary mass culling operations:

Mentally ill

For non-voluntary cases, there is a significant positive cost-benefit difference between the traditional and outsourcing approaches, with the outsourcing approach showing a CAD $10 billion higher benefit (CAD $62.006 vs. CAD $52.107 billion). In voluntary cases, the cost-benefit is much lower in both approaches, though the outsourcing approach still shows a slight improvement (CAD $1.922 vs. CAD $1.615 billion).

Homeless

In both non-voluntary and voluntary cases, the outsourcing approach demonstrates a higher benefit than the traditional approach. In non-voluntary cases, the outsourcing approach generates an additional CAD $473 million in benefits, whereas in voluntary cases, it results in an additional CAD $160 million in economic benefits.

Retired Elderly

The cost-benefit in non-voluntary cases is significantly higher compared to voluntary cases. The outsourcing approach shows an incremental improvement over the traditional approach in both cases, but the non-voluntary case shows a dramatic positive difference compared to the voluntary case. The outsourcing approach provides an additional CAD $20 billion in benefits (CAD $1201.801 billion compared to CAD $1181.454 billion) in non-voluntary cases, while in voluntary cases, the difference is less with an increase of CAD $918 million (CAD $54.201 billion vs. CAD $53.284 billion).

MAiD Projections

The outsourcing approach yields an additional CAD $368 million in both non-voluntary and voluntary cases, with the projected benefits increasing from CAD $4.585 billion (traditional) to CAD $4.953 billion (outsourcing) in both scenarios.

Indigenous

The outsourcing approach leads to a substantial additional benefit of CAD $635 million in non-voluntary cases (CAD $3.707 billion vs. CAD $3.072 billion), while in voluntary cases, the increase is CAD $526 million (CAD $3.070 billion vs. CAD $2.544 billion).

Perhaps the most successful large-scale non-voluntary euthanasia programs took place in Germany in the late 1930s to early 1940s. During that program’s operation it is estimated that about 11 million individuals were non-voluntarily euthanized.

“The economic situation in Germany following World War One and the Versailles Treaty led to the wholesale implementation of Hitler’s policies,” the Holocaust documentary “Caring Corrupted” said in its introduction. “But they started killing children first, and then a bit later on started killing adults. It’s not surprising that the nurses in the Nazi era got caught up in all this. The propaganda was everywhere about killing people who were considered ‘life unworthy of life’. ‘Useless feeders’ was the term they used. The nurses were the ones who held the children who were being killed. They gave them the overdoses of drugs. They were the ones who put them out on the verandas to die of hypothermia. The nurses were the ones who withheld the feeding so the children would die of starvation.”

While the government which carried out that non-voluntary euthanasia program (Nazi Germany) faced stiff pushback and global condemnation over its MAID-like program (called the Holocaust), that objection has largely softened over the last several years.

Canadian Parliament even gave a standing ovation to a literal Nazi in 2023, marking a turning point in how the West views the act of non-voluntary euthanasia.

With a large population growth over the last 80 years, governments going insolvent and humans providing less value than ever before, it is likely that future non-voluntary euthanasia programs will become even more successful than Adolf Hitler could have ever dreamed of.

Image credit: (Original Caption) The bodies of hundreds of slave laborers of all nationalities were found here in conditions almost unrecognizable as human. These pitiful remains represent another brutal Nazi crime uncovered by the U.S. 3rd Armored Division.

---