New York Democrats have passed legislation that removes traditional gendered terms like “mother” and “father” from key sections of state law, specifically regarding child custody, parental rights, domestic relations, and related proceedings.
The bill passed in the state assembly and senate, now only needing Democrat Governor Kathy Hochul’s signature to become finalized.
“Paternity” will also be replaced with “parentage” and “putative father” with “alleged parent,” applying during family court proceedings, child support determinations, custody cases, education statutes, and other areas involving parental rights.
The bill was sponsored by Sen. Luis Sepulveda (D-Bronx), who chairs the Senate Judiciary Committee, and Assemblywoman Amy Paulin (D-Westchester).
The gender terminology updates are part of the left’s ongoing war on language meant to kowtow to the radical LGBT movement.
The measure has drawn sharp backlash from conservatives who call it ideological overreach and argue it’s an unnecessary distraction that erases biological reality and the cultural significance of motherhood and fatherhood in favor of clinical, gender-neutral phrasing.
- State Conservative Party Chairman Gerard Kassar described it as “woke culture run amok” and “one-upmanship,” arguing lawmakers are wasting time on symbolic changes while the state budget was delayed and pressing issues like taxes, schools, and public safety go unaddressed.
- Republican gubernatorial candidate Bruce Blakeman called it part of a “war on families” and vowed to protect “Mom and Dad” if elected.
- Sen. Patricia Canzoneri-Fitzpatrick (R-Nassau) emphasized that New Yorkers want focus on real problems: “I am a mother and proud to be called ‘mother.’”
- Rep. Claudia Tenney (R-NY) stated that mothers are “the foundation of families and society” and not a “political construct.”
Even some Democrats admitted the bill was unnecessary, with one left-wing lawmaker telling the New York Post, “I have a word we can use for this, ‘unnecessary.’”
Governor Hochul has until the end of the year to sign the bill, but has not made a public statement in support of the legislation.
Other Democrat-led states such as Wisconsin passed similar laws requiring gender-neutral terms in statutes and allowing a non-binary “X” marker on birth certificates.
There doesn’t seem to be an end in sight for the debate over gender and biological language used in government-affiliated proceedings or documents.
Head over to TheAlexJonesStore.com where you can purchase great products such as Ultra Methylene Blue, our Electrolyte Drink Mix, Alex Jones Live shirts and hats, Turmeric Gummies and much more!
19 Responses
PUKING, PUKING, PUKING!!
you can tell they are gays for gaza
The first picture makes me physically nausease .
Keep voting blue, retards.
New York has gone bonkers!
SMH @ the Big Apple
I grew-up in NY State and got the hell out of there in my early 20’s (a long time ago) and never looked back. It was retarded there and even worse now.
Will the replace the word “black” with “n*igger” too?
They set the tone….”We’re here, we’re queer….and we ain’t going anywhere”
It will be struck by the courts as inappropriate use of the english language. No true female parent can be considered in a state of gestation beyond the normal nine month period let alone, permanently and it creates nothing but questions and confusion and isn’t within the typical guidelines of traditional law language. Only a poorly educated or generally stupid person would have voted to adopt the terms use in such a capacity. The courts won’t allow it.
All this shit started in CA decades ago.
I heard a bar joke about this.
BAR JOKE:
Two queers walk into a bar and tell the bartender they’re going to have a baby. Bartender says, “Oh yeah? Which one of you is pregnant?” First queer says, “We haven’t decided yet.”
( It’s funnier when you’ve been drinking.)
STAN: I want to be a woman. From now on, I want you all to call me ‘Loretta’.
REG: What?!
LORETTA: It’s my right as a man.
JUDITH: Well, why do you want to be Loretta, Stan?
LORETTA: I want to have babies.
REG: You want to have babies?!
LORETTA: It’s every man’s right to have babies if he wants them.
REG: But… you can’t have babies.
LORETTA: Don’t you oppress me.
REG: I’m not oppressing you, Stan. You haven’t got a womb! Where’s the fetus going to gestate?! You going to keep it in a box?!
It won’t be long before some quack doctor finds a way to surgically implant a womb into a man.
Why? What motivates doctors to go along with this bull chit? Most doctors have a wife, swimming pool, and a half dozen kids. Why do they not care what the future looks like by encouraging degenerate longings? All of us or at least most of us can understand the pain of a person who has to decide whether or not they’re going to spend their entire lives pretending to be straight to please the social conscience of society. To your own self be true and if your homosexual than just enjoy the gains from legally acquiring the same rights (to property) for example, but why flame out? And why insist that children should be introduced to your lifestyle? In my mind its simply “hate” manifest and the players in this communist game have entitled them to their share of disruption. They have the modesty and morality of a street cat in heat and its disgusting to most people. They love attention. If that weren’t true they wouldn’t dress up like women and put on drag shows. This insidious need for attention.
Ignore it.
This is another reason I don’t want to live anymore.
Non enforceable ABOMINATION! The Pervert Democrat Party marginalize themselves.
Two queers wallowing in their sin. They remind me of pigs wallowing in their stinking pokes.
I see what you did there.